<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Gives Link Advice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://directoryblog.webpronews.com/2008/10/13/google-gives-link-advice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://directoryblog.webpronews.com/2008/10/13/google-gives-link-advice/</link>
	<description>Updates About the WebProNews eBusiness Directory</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 09:54:41 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daily Opt</title>
		<link>http://directoryblog.webpronews.com/2008/10/13/google-gives-link-advice/comment-page-1/#comment-1951</link>
		<dc:creator>Daily Opt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 22:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://directoryblog.webpronews.com/?p=69#comment-1951</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I have to say I am glad to receive the reassurance as well. I believing companies that have been relying too heavily on pay-per-post or other sources of paid links may be feeling the heat of it now. Of course, even though you may be providing creditable content doesn&#039;t always mean that viewers will link to it, which is why I believe Google may be leaving the direction of link dependency and moving toward rewarding those that spend the hard earned hours developing content that readers, surfers, and viewers can benefit from, even if they don&#039;t provide a link.

If you want a daily tip, then you need to really spend some quality time putting together content that can carries its own weight in the SERPs. Analysis, Statistics, Reviews, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I have to say I am glad to receive the reassurance as well. I believing companies that have been relying too heavily on pay-per-post or other sources of paid links may be feeling the heat of it now. Of course, even though you may be providing creditable content doesn&#8217;t always mean that viewers will link to it, which is why I believe Google may be leaving the direction of link dependency and moving toward rewarding those that spend the hard earned hours developing content that readers, surfers, and viewers can benefit from, even if they don&#8217;t provide a link.</p>
<p>If you want a daily tip, then you need to really spend some quality time putting together content that can carries its own weight in the SERPs. Analysis, Statistics, Reviews, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: loozegear</title>
		<link>http://directoryblog.webpronews.com/2008/10/13/google-gives-link-advice/comment-page-1/#comment-1933</link>
		<dc:creator>loozegear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 09:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://directoryblog.webpronews.com/?p=69#comment-1933</guid>
		<description>Glad to see that I am doing something right</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to see that I am doing something right</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
